2481 Rate this article:
No rating

Data Structure Analysis

Dain Cilke

One of the main questions anybody using a programming language has to ask themselves is "what data structures should I be using?" This can be a complicated and difficult question as there are many trade-offs to consider. If it is desired to have a dynamic data type, IDL provides multiple options. In this analysis we will consider: dynamic arrays, lists, hashes, and ordered hashes and their ability to insert and delete elements. To start, let's review our data structures. Dynamic arrays are based on the ability for IDL arrays to resize themselves. For example:

array = [1,2,3,4]               ; Declaration

array = [array, 5]              ; Insert

array = [array[0:1],array[3:*]] ; Remove


Lists use the IDL object LIST:

list = LIST(1,2,3,4)    ; Declaration

list.add,5              ; Insert

list.remove, 2          ; Remove


Hashes use the IDL object HASH:

hash = HASH([1,2,3,4],[1,2,3,4]) ; Declaration

hash[5] = 5                      ; Insert

hash.remove, 2                   ; Remove


Ordered hashes use the IDL object ORDEREDHASH:

ohash = ORDEREDHASH([1,2,3,4],[1,2,3,4]) ; Declaration

ohash[5] = 5                             ; Insert

ohash.remove, 2                          ; Remove


For each data structure we will time how long it takes to insert and remove n elements (Note: the inserts/removals are done inside of a FOR loop, one insert/removal per iteration. This is done to simulate an application which expects a high degree of volatility in the use of their data structures. However, since IDL is a vectorized language, it is always best to try to group multiple operations into a single call). Please see the attached plots for the results of the runs. The results are what we would expect from a simple big-O analysis. Dynamic arrays are comparable for small input sizes, however, as soon as the size of the input grows, it becomes much faster to use a hash (either type) or a list. In terms of pure speed for any arbitrary input size, list  is the fastest. However, if you know your input bounded to a few elements, all of the proposed data structures can offer a similar performance.

Note: For this analysis, all the data structures had similar performance up to 10,000 elements. This is in no way a comprehensive test and the results may differ on your system. However, the rule of thumb I follow is, if your input is less than 10,000 elements choose the data structure which is the easiest for you to work with.


A Technical Dive into Creating Accurate Digital Terrain Models


Live Webinar | July 25 Creating accurate digital terrain models (DTMs) is essential for modeling areas of... more »

The Science, and Art, of Hyperspectral Image Analysis


Harris Geospatial Solutions – June 7, 2018 Automation is being touted as the wave of the future for... more »


Sign up to receive the latest news, events, technologies and special offers.