There were some updates to histograms and stretching in ENVI (not ENVI Classic) as mentioned in the What's new documentation under Image Processing:
https://www.harrisgeospatial.com/do...html#Image

Could it be the difference is that you are auto-stretching on the view extent in 5.4?

Hello!

I read the what's new update, with the added function of stretch on view extent. But the answer here is no, I am displaying the image at full extent, & comparing the rainbow color table display to the .tif from the exact same image generated in ENVI 5.3.1. There is a significant difference in the appearance of the image between the 2% stretch in 5.4 and the 2% stretch in 5.3.1. If I open the histogram stretch tool for 5.4, the edges - defining the pixel range that the 255 colors are distributed across - are at 99.99% on the high end, and 6-8% on the low end. When I manually move those edges to 98% and 2%, then the color distribution of the image in 5.4 matches that of 5.3.1. There was no additional processing or manipulation of the original image between when I opened it in 5.3.1. and in 5.4.

So either the algorithm has been changed to calculate the 2% linear fit in a different way on purpose, or there is an error in the tool.

I asked the developer who made the changes to the statistics calculation in ENVI 5.4 about any changes in the algorithm. There have been some changes but they did not think it would affect most data since it was primarily a change to support radar data that is floating point and have unusual data ranges. Would your data be similar to this?

If not and you believe there is a problem with the statistics calculation, I would invite you to come through technical support so we might be able to access your data and determine what might be going on.

Thank you for the reply! I am working with MODIS data, where we have calculated the derivative and then performed a varimax-rotated PCA analysis on the data. The image that I am actually plotting is the VPCA score, which is a float point, but I don't think it has unusual data ranges, the value is in the range of -0.009 to 0.9.

I can submit a technical support request, to further investigate. Thank you!